Columnists
Politicians have long been regarded as a dubious breed, the best of them merely sufferable and the rest simply reprehensible. Whenever they make decisions, right or wrong, they make enemies. Because they are authority figures, the public delights in learning of their foibles. When troubles arise, they are convenient scapegoats.
Nineteenth century Elgin newspapers spared few adjectives in criticizing the failures of elected officials. Whatever their position, high or low, none was exempt from the editor's invective.
Representatives at the state capital have seldom enjoyed a favorable reputation. "There was a time when to be a state legislator meant something honorable," opined the weekly Every Saturday in 1885. "So many men filling the office of late have so disgraced it that the term commands no respect. A legislator—an Illinois legislator—is looked up to as much as is the scum on a stagnant pond."
Ten years later the same paper was more specific: "The rank corruption existing at Springfield, in which at least two of Kane County's trio of representatives are playing a high hand, is creating a little comment of late."
The Weekly Advocate described the honorable representative in Washington this way in 1882: "In all portions of the district Congressman —'s impotency as an official has caused disgust... In his dealings with men he has shown a wanton disregard for truth; a complete lack of manly honor."
In 1878 the Daily News, after printing a cartoon picturing the mayor of Elgin as a jackass, called him an "adjudged lunatic" and added: "There is no such thing as truthfulness about him or his clique, and hardly a decent man in the city can be found to support him. It is among the bummers and street-corner loafers that he receives his backing."
About another mayor, the Every Saturday in 1889 asked: "Why should the poor unfortunate vagrants be dragged through the streets to the lockup every time they get a little intoxicated, while the Mayor of Elgin is permitted to reel about town unmolested?"
Possibly the best local example of a press diatribe appeared in the Advocate in 1882. It was directed at an Elgin justice of the peace who had reportedly hid under a sofa to escape a police raid on a disorderly house in Chicago.
"The fellow is a gambler, deadbeat, pimp and drunkard ... He is a moral leper and a mental imbecile. He is decayed from the effects of debauchery ... He is incapable of comprehending, not to mention practicing, average decency or passable morality. Such is the individual elected to administer the laws of this community."
Are politicians better behaved today or are journalists more circumspect? We could credit both professions with improvement, but this columnist can't be considered an unbiased judge of the question. Add a comment
Nineteenth century Elgin newspapers spared few adjectives in criticizing the failures of elected officials. Whatever their position, high or low, none was exempt from the editor's invective.
Representatives at the state capital have seldom enjoyed a favorable reputation. "There was a time when to be a state legislator meant something honorable," opined the weekly Every Saturday in 1885. "So many men filling the office of late have so disgraced it that the term commands no respect. A legislator—an Illinois legislator—is looked up to as much as is the scum on a stagnant pond."
Ten years later the same paper was more specific: "The rank corruption existing at Springfield, in which at least two of Kane County's trio of representatives are playing a high hand, is creating a little comment of late."
The Weekly Advocate described the honorable representative in Washington this way in 1882: "In all portions of the district Congressman —'s impotency as an official has caused disgust... In his dealings with men he has shown a wanton disregard for truth; a complete lack of manly honor."
In 1878 the Daily News, after printing a cartoon picturing the mayor of Elgin as a jackass, called him an "adjudged lunatic" and added: "There is no such thing as truthfulness about him or his clique, and hardly a decent man in the city can be found to support him. It is among the bummers and street-corner loafers that he receives his backing."
About another mayor, the Every Saturday in 1889 asked: "Why should the poor unfortunate vagrants be dragged through the streets to the lockup every time they get a little intoxicated, while the Mayor of Elgin is permitted to reel about town unmolested?"
Possibly the best local example of a press diatribe appeared in the Advocate in 1882. It was directed at an Elgin justice of the peace who had reportedly hid under a sofa to escape a police raid on a disorderly house in Chicago.
"The fellow is a gambler, deadbeat, pimp and drunkard ... He is a moral leper and a mental imbecile. He is decayed from the effects of debauchery ... He is incapable of comprehending, not to mention practicing, average decency or passable morality. Such is the individual elected to administer the laws of this community."
Are politicians better behaved today or are journalists more circumspect? We could credit both professions with improvement, but this columnist can't be considered an unbiased judge of the question. Add a comment
